U.S. climate pledge faces test with global impact in the Senate

Washington (Associated Press)-After discussing climate talks in the United Nations negotiations in Scotland, the Biden administration is now testing whether a divided United States can take a climate walk: using the narrowest profit to promote large-scale investment in a new era of clean energy in the Senate.

this The House of Representatives passed an approximately $2 trillion social policy and climate bill Friday, including $555 billion for clean energy, although the Senate will almost certainly change the legislation. The final content of the climate section of the bill will have a lasting impact on the United States and all its neighbors on the planet, and will help determine whether the United States will fulfill its promised share and keep climate damage at no more severe levels than it is now.

Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner (Sylvester Turner), who fought against the five disasters announced by the federal government, said: “The problem is that when these storms come with such a frequency, once you deal with This storm, you are dealing with the next storm.” During his six years leading the global oil center on the Texas Gulf Coast.

Turner speaks on the sidelines The United Nations Conference in Glasgow, There, he was one of dozens of mayors driving climate investment. After years of dying in tropical storms and hurricanes intensified storms, Houston residents have froze to death in record numbers this year in the wavering polar vortex.

“So for our fragile community…people are already on the edge, and it will continue to decline,” Turner said.

In the Senate, Democratic Senator Joe Manchin from West Virginia’s Coal State’s cost-cutting requirements and the strict rules of the house seem certain to force major changes to the bill. This will trigger new disputes between centrists and moderates in the party, and these disputes may take weeks to resolve.

If Biden’s package is passed, the impact of its promotion of clean energy and technology will mean that the United States may only miss Biden’s goal of halving fossil fuel emissions by the end of this decade—more precisely, to reduce fossil fuel emissions. Fuel emissions are halved. Compared with 2005 levels, the US will emit carbon dioxide by 2030.

This is based on a model by researchers at Princeton University and elsewhere, explains climate scientist and energy analyst Zeke Hausfeather.

However, academic models show that if Biden’s bill fails in Congress, the United States may be far behind its emission reduction commitments by 20%.

Hausfeather said that in any case, market forces make renewable energy cheaper, which will help promote the development of the United States.

However, in the case of abandoning promises, if we fail to deliver on our promises, the United States “will become more difficult to convince countries such as China and India to fulfill their climate promises,” pointed out Haus Feiser, director of the Research Center for Breakthrough Institute.

Over time, the United States is the world’s largest emitter of coal, natural gas, and oil fume. These coal, natural gas, and oil fume are changing the atmosphere and heating the earth. China, which relies on coal-fired power plants, is currently the largest emitter, while the United States is the second largest emitter. India, which has a rapidly growing population and is highly dependent on coal, is expected to surpass these two countries in the coming decades.

In Glasgow, Bangladesh’s climate negotiator, Quamrul Chowdhury, has for years been fighting for rapid and large-scale cuts by the United States and other polluting countries to keep him and other low-lying countries above the water.

After the US climate policy clashed with the political parties of the incoming government, Chowdhury was eager for Congress to finalize the deal.

“In your domestic legislation, if it is included, it will help,” Chowdhury said. At the climate conference, leaders “made promises, made promises, but failed to deliver them. Promises made will only be broken.”

The most dramatic climate change in the United States is the Trump administration. It makes the United States withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, slows down offshore wind power projects, and promotes oil and gas exploration and drilling. It cancelled the Obama administration’s projects aimed at promoting clean energy and curbing coal.

Many Republicans in Congress are now stepping forward to demand a middle ground on the climate issue between Trump and Biden. Biden’s decline in popularity has raised doubts about the continued governance of the Democratic Party in Washington.

In the Conservative Caucus created by Republican Representative John Curtis of Utah, Republicans stated that they knew how to keep voters away from fossil fuels and advocated a climate policy that particularly continued to use natural gas.

They emphasize trees and carbon capture technologies that have not yet been developed on a large scale to capture climate-damaging emissions.

“We know that we must reduce emissions. Let us now discuss how to proceed in depth,” Curtis said in a panel discussion with other American lawmakers in Glasgow. “That is, I think, for us, this is a new place.”

Featherhaus said that depending on whether the next Republican government is as active as Trump against efforts to reduce the use of fossil fuels, another U.S. retreat in climate efforts may put the country further behind in achieving Biden’s emission reduction targets. A few percentage points.

But “I think the greater impact… will come from the lack of global leadership on this issue and create the impression that the U.S. commitment is not credible (quite reasonable),” he said in an email.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *