Tennis star Peng Shuai’s case reveals the true purpose of China’s censorship

When the civic space is closed and deleted, individuals with little or no contact outside of social media will be taken away by the backlog of resources and contacts. In the case of WeChat—Chinese users use WeChat for chat, payment, blog posting, travel, and other digital record keeping—suspension or bans prevent users from using many daily communication and life tools.

This has nothing to do with the subject. This review is fundamentally about the dismantling of social resources. Content deletion not only solves the short-term problem of text or images that government actors want to delete, but it also weakens activists’ ability to rebuild by isolating and inhibiting their ability to create new resources. Inspectors can ensure that these groups remain silent. The censorship system is conceptualized in a piecemeal manner, ignoring the damage that may be caused by destroying the foundations of the organization and civil society components.

Chinese examiners have In the past ten years, there has not been a censorship system that only uses content or keywords. It has been discovered very early that the social nature of social media is the key to the modernization and maintenance of the Great Firewall of China. In a speech in 2016, Xi Jinping himself described cyberspace as a “spiritual garden” for information innovation and cybersecurity.he claim It is believed that this conceptual garden is “clear in the sky, fresh air, and good ecology in cyberspace, which is in the interests of the people.” The deteriorating plague atmosphere of cyberspace ecology, in turn, is not in the interests of the people. “What is the key to his analogy, who must be trimmed and removed.”

The Communist Party’s internal literature also recognizes the power of digital social networks in addition to prohibiting certain keywords. In the preliminary study of the Weibo community environment, the researchers identified the environment as the new frontier of civic space.Party scholar wrote“Because cyberspace has no systemic obstacles, and no ideological constraints… Different classes, fields, and types of media can communicate, merge, and confront ideas, making the public opinion environment more and more complicated.”

Topic-based bans are indeed still an integral part of the censorship system, including historical taboo events, such as the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989, and content published by banned media such as New York Times, Washington post, And BBC. However, after the rise of bloggers and social media influencers in the late 2000s, the public opinion environment was precisely the goal of a movement aimed at reducing influencer influence and building community capacity for non-governmental thought leaders. In theory, social media users with a large number of followers are ordinary citizens. However, the mid-2010s gave them a choice: they could serve and support the politics of the Chinese authorities, or they could face law enforcement discipline and community disintegration. In 2013, in the frenzy of suppression by bloggers, the novelist Hao Qun Summarize This trend is appropriate: “They want to cut off these relationships and make the relationship on Weibo atomized, just like the relationship in Chinese society, everyone is just an isolated atom.”

By the time Peng appears in November 2021 Video call Together with Thomas Bach, President of the International Olympic Committee, the Weibo and WeChat environment has almost eliminated offensive keywords or refer to A clumsy cover-up email sent to the Women’s Tennis Association earlier.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.