Rohingya Sue Meta/Facebook genocide Burma for 150B USD

A picture of the article titled Rohingya Sue Meta paid $150 billion in compensation to Facebook for allegedly participating in the Burmese genocide

Photo: Kirill Kudriavtsev (Getty Images)

For many years, there have been reports that the Myanmar military has used Facebook as a Key tool In its Continued slaughter Percentage of the Muslim Rohingya population in the country.Investigation has Established The platform has been publicly used to incite Vicious rumors And organization Planned attack In the Rohingya, their lives have been thrown into Irreparable chaos, And even so ended.Even today, it’s not difficult for users in the region often They found their feed was full of rape and death threats.

Now, some of these Rohingya are fighting back.

A Rohingya woman in Illinois who did not want to be named filed a lawsuit Class action This week, the California Supreme Court sued Facebook’s parent company Meta for $150 billion, claiming that Facebook’s launch in the country in 2011 was “a major cause and long-term existence of the final Rohingya genocide.” It also claimed that despite continuous warnings about the issue since 2013, the company has taken very few steps to curb the grotesque anti-Rohingya posts, groups, and coordinated accounts running on its platform.

“The core of this complaint is the realization that Facebook is willing to use the lives of Rohingya people in exchange for better market penetration in a small country in Southeast Asia. Successfully contacted most Burmese people and continued to operate there. This is an overall assessment of Facebook. The impact of value and bottom line is negligible,” the lawsuit reads.

“In the end, Facebook benefited little from its continued presence in Myanmar, and the consequences for the Rohingya could not be more serious,” it continued. “However, in the face of this knowledge and having the tools to stop it, it just keeps going.

’The suit is part of a “coordinated legal action” by lawyers in the U.S. and UK to take Facebook to task over its role in the ongoing Myanmar crisis, according to a website Established to declare litigation.California class action lawsuits represent more than 10,000 Rohingya refugees currently living in the United States, while the British claim is made on behalf of refugees living anywhere else in the world.

In an email to Gizmodo, a Meta spokesperson rejected the company’s description in the lawsuit. “We are shocked by the crimes committed by Rohingya in Myanmar,” she said, and then listed some of the steps the company has taken in recent years to ensure their safety on the platform.

“We have established a dedicated team of Burmese speakers, banned the armed forces, disrupted networks that manipulate public debate, and took action on harmful misinformation to help protect people’s safety.”

Although Facebook already These measures were recently introduced, and the statement evaded the company’s five years of taking the system seriously. TonIn fact, after years of warnings and countless deaths, Facebook bothered to hire content moderators Speak local language, Or consider a clear prohibition Violent account, Is a tragedy example of too little and too late.

As the suit said, “NUntil 2018-after the damage has been done-Facebook executives… docilely admitted that Facebook should and could have done more.But at least early During Facebook’s entire tenure in Myanmar, the company’s efforts were profit-centered first, and people-centered second.


Discussions about Facebook’s place in Myanmar usually refer to how in that country—as in most parts of the global south—Facebook is more than just a social media application, as it is in the United States.There, Facebook literally means Yes the Internet: Web access, business, and personnel contacts are all included in a neat little package. Of course, this did not happen overnight. Years before activists warned of the platform’s hasty handling of violent content, Facebook was busy signing agreements with local telecom operators in Southeast Asia to bet on a surge in the number of Internet users in the region, which would make the company huge profits.

For context, A report for 2019 Google claims that the value of Southeast Asia’s digital economy exceeds US$100 billion, having tripled its size in the previous four years. By 2025?This number is expected to triple again, Reaching 300 billion US dollars.

As Paul Webster, Facebook’s telecommunications director at the time, Tell In 2015, an advertising publication focused on Asia said: “In this industry, if you are not one step ahead, you are actually going backwards.” This method is still applicable today, and the company continues Actively promote Establish telecommunications partnerships-and hell, literally Telecommunications infrastructure-Enter these “emerging markets.” Although we don’t know what kind of cuts Facebook has obtained from these transactions (the company does not disclose this information), we do know that turning “connectivity” and “Facebook” into synonyms is a move that translates into a surge in these regions Those who are very important daily active users.

For Facebook, daily active users are daily active users, even if these daily active users are the targets of the genocidal regime.For example, in Myanmar today, some analysts say there are Approximately 22 million Facebook users The entire region-or about 40% of the country’s total population.

This 40% is like the rest Of Facebook’s global users are targeted through advertisements in their various feeds. When these users interact with these advertisements in a certain way, advertisers pay for it, and Facebook profit from it.

In other words, Facebook doesn’t care about close to 25% of Myanmar locals live Below the poverty line, or these poverty figures will Will almost certainly rise, Due to the global pandemic and Continued military coup. First, it cares about its advertisers. It always has. And those brands—for whatever cruel reasons—still see profit In Myanmar.At the same time, because of Facebook Yes On the Internet in that country, those advertisers are stuck Cut checks for a company Public acknowledgment Provide a platform for UN generals Say Should be tried for genocide.

This is certainly a frustrating reality, but it is also a gain Huge profits For Facebook, therefore, any lawsuit—even one made by refugees whose lives it helped ruin—seems unlikely to have any impact.Admitting this case means keeping the money on the table, and that is always The last thing Facebook wants to do.

renew: Added Meta’s response to our comment request.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.