Infrastructure negotiations put Biden’s entire agenda at risk

Washington (Associated Press)-President Joe Biden’s most recent leaping into the Senate to reach a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure agreement has been ups and downs than he had dreamt of Plans to promote roads, railways, and other public works projects are even more important.

Over the past few weeks, one obstacle after another in the outcome of infrastructure negotiations will affect what may become the crown jewel of his legacy.That will be He hopes to receive 3.5 trillion U.S. dollars in federal funding. Family education and healthcare costs, medical insurance expansion, and efforts to curb climate change.

Biden and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (DN.Y.) will need the support of every Democratic moderate and progressive person to drive the $3.5 trillion bill through the Senate by 50 to 50 votes, Vice President Kama La Harris’ vote will break the tie. If infrastructure talks break down, moderates — making their projects a top priority — may find it harder to support the subsequent $3.5 trillion plan, which has already made them cringe because of its price tag and possible taxation and taxation of the wealthy. company.

“I would say that if the bipartisan infrastructure bill breaks, everything will break,” West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, one of the most conservative Democrats in his House of Representatives, warned reporters this week.

This may well prove to be an exaggeration, because moderates like him will face tremendous pressure from Biden, Schumer and others to support The 3.5 trillion dollar package, Regardless of the fate of the bipartisan plan. But it illustrates the balancing act between the centrist and the progressive that the top Democrats must face.

“If the infrastructure collapses, I hope it will not collapse. You will have a hard time getting some Democrats to support the 3.5 trillion dollar bill,” Steny Hoyer, the second leader of the House of Representatives, in a briefing on Tuesday China represents an interview. Party leaders will be able to lose no more than three Democrats to win in the House of Representatives with 435 members.

Both sides of the talks expressed new optimism Regarding the trading prospects on Tuesday, they had previously expressed this view, but did not produce results. This uncertainty underscores that the Democrats’ agenda is at a hopeful but precarious moment. The stakes seem to be too great for them to fail, but they may still fail.

Biden met with Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema at the White House on Tuesday. The moderate Democratic leader has been working hard to reach an infrastructure agreement with Republican Senators. The president also used several tweets to stimulate lawmakers, one of which said: “There is no Democratic road or Republican bridge-infrastructure affects all of us, and I believe we must work together to find a solution.”

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki stated that Biden and the movie theater were “very consistent on the way forward” and expressed optimism, but also said that the president “has not set a new deadline for reaching an agreement”. Several target dates for an agreement have come, although Schumer hopes that the Senate will vote on the package before sending lawmakers home for the August recess.

The cinema is a centrist, and she alienated some Democrats who thought she was unpredictable.

According to two persons who did not want to be named, Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio told House Democrats in private on Tuesday that the infrastructure agreement that the senator was trying to complete was “junk”, which illustrates this point. He also said that they said the measure was made by “three Republicans” who specifically named Rob Portman, R-Ohio, Susan Collins, R-Maine, and the cinema as senators. .

The moderate Democrats have long made infrastructure deals their top priority. The bipartisan cooperation embodied in this agreement, together with the meat and potatoes it takes home, makes their goals surpass the individual 3.5 trillion dollar family and environmental program measures.

If the infrastructure negotiations fail, the moderates will lose victory, and if reached, it may make them more willing to make concessions on the $3.5 trillion measure. The collapse may also trigger a new internal struggle within the Democratic Party about how much infrastructure spending will be transferred to a huge domestic spending plan and how this will affect its overall price tag.

Even Republicans are divided on infrastructure measures. What does the failure of the two-party negotiations mean, because both parties are concerned about the 2022 election, when the control of the House of Representatives and the Senate will be fully functional.

Some Republicans worry that the approval of the bipartisan infrastructure plan will help the Democrats pass its $3.5 trillion measure, making moderate Democrats more willing to cooperate with their colleagues on subsequent, more costly legislation.

They also said that if inflation or other economic problems occur in a large-scale federal spending plan, supporting infrastructure measures will enable Democrats to shift the blame to the Republicans.

But it is also said that since the Republican Party cannot prevent the Democrats from passing its $3.5 trillion bill, the Republican Party may wish to support an infrastructure agreement. This will allow Republicans to bring back some of their $1 trillion popular projects back to their hometowns.

The Democrats plan to use special budget rules to prevent Republicans from using obstruction bills — a delay that requires 60 votes in the Senate to stop — to undermine the $3.5 trillion measure.

These Republicans also said that the passage of infrastructure measures will make it more difficult for Manchin and the cinema – as well as moderate Democrats facing re-election in swing states such as Maggie Hassan in New Hampshire and Mark Kelly in Arizona – to vote for more The big 3.5 trillion dollar plan.

“I think this makes their members more on the defensive, in my opinion, have to defend untenable spending and taxes,” said John Thun, the Republican leader of the South Dakota Senate.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *