Fox News seeks expert report on Georgia voting machine bug

ATLANTA — In defending a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems, Fox News is seeking to obtain an expert report, filed under seal in a separate lawsuit in Georgia, that the authors say details the company’s touchscreens Vulnerability of voting machines.

Election Security Specialist J. Alex Haldeman spent 12 weeks examining voting machines used in Georgia and a dozen other states and said he “Multiple critical security holes” were found in the machines that would allow attackers to install malware. his The report was filed in federal court in Atlanta in July in support of a long-running lawsuit by election security advocates and voters who want Georgia to scrap electronic voting machines in favor of handwritten paper ballots.

Dominion filed a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News in March in Delaware, where both companies are incorporated, saying the cable news giant falsely claimed the voting company rigged the 2020 election . Last month, a judge denied Fox’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit.The lawsuit cites Haldeman, Say he “Tell Fox explicitly, ‘There is absolutely no evidence that Dominion Voting Machines changed any votes in this election.'”

Voting Technologist and Director of the Center for Computer Security and Society at the University of Michigan, Haldeman is an expert witness in the Georgia case, and his The report was filed under seal and designated as “lawyer’s eyes only,” not available to even actual parties to the Georgia lawsuit. Only their lawyers and experts can see it.

Now, Fox News is asking to see HaldemanThe report, in a motion filed Wednesday in Atlanta federal court, said, among other things, it wanted to “determine the extent to which it his The purported statement” was given to Fox News. The motion asks U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg to grant Fox’s six attorneys and consultants access to the report, saying they will comply with confidentiality requirements in a court order of protection.

Haldemanis an ardent supporter of hand-marked paper ballots, he said in a statement to the court. his As an expert witness in the Georgia case, his task was not to demonstrate any malicious activity in past elections, but to determine whether the machines had security breaches. he In an interview with the Associated Press last year, he said he There is no evidence that these vulnerabilities were exploited to alter the outcome of the 2020 election.

Haldeman It has been said that the information is in his The report should be made public so that officials where the device is used can work to mitigate the problem. to this end, he A redacted version of the report was created to exclude specific parts that showed how the hack was carried out, attorneys said at a hearing in the Georgia case in November.

Lawyers for the Coalition for Good Governance, a plaintiff in the case, asked at the hearing for permission to share the redacted report with the group’s executive director, but Totenberg said she wasn’t ready to address the issue at the time.

So far, she has expressed reluctance to make the report public, saying at a hearing in November that the information would not be disseminated to anyone “who has some kind of interest in it.” She did say she would not object to sharing the report with Dominion.

Dominion did not immediately respond to an email Thursday asking whether the company or its lawyers had seen the report or had explained its contents to them. The Georgia secretary of state’s office declined to respond when asked if anyone in the office had seen or requested to see the report.

Louisiana uses the problematic Dominion system for early voting. The secretary of state there filed a motion last month asking Totenberg to access the report “for the purpose of uncovering unknown potential vulnerabilities and taking necessary mitigation and procedural steps to address any potential security holes in the system”.

In filings opposing such visits, the state’s attorneys argued that, Haldeman For the purpose of the lawsuit, was allowed access to Georgia’s voting system, but not he Reports can be provided to “various government entities and other individuals.” The report “contains sensitive, non-public information about Georgia’s voting system,” they wrote.

Totenberg on Monday rejected the Louisiana secretary of state’s request, writing that she “remains concerned about the risks associated with further dissemination of the report.” She worries that if she allows access to the Louisiana secretary of state, it could “open the floodgates” to similar requests from others, “which would also increase the potential for hacking and misuse of sensitive, classified election system information.”

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.