Craig Wright cleared all expenses except for the conversion count, and the jury awarded W&K Info Defense $100 million – Bitcoin News

The Kleiman v. Wright trial has ended, and Craig Wright and his defense team have won all claims except for one conversion offence. According to a court reporter, Craig Wright, who claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, said he “sighed a sigh of relief.”

Craig Wright’s defense won all claims except for the conversion-Wright said “I will not go anywhere, I am here for the long term”

After the jury is over Deadlock inside Kleiman v. Wright In a few days last week, the jurors made their decision on Monday, December 6, 2021. Craig Wright and his defense team from Rivero Mestre LLP successfully defeated all the allegations, except for one allegation.

The jury ruled that, although most of Wright’s charges were exempted, he must pay W&K Info Defense US$100 million with no punitive damages. Law360 reporter Carolina Bolado, who participated in the trial, explain Judge Beth Bloom praised the lawyers who provided “excellent representation” to their clients.Borado also detailed Wright said he was “incredibly relieved.”

The plaintiff Kleiman Estate accused Wright of manipulating the Bitcoin heritage and intellectual property rights of his former business partner Dave Kleiman. The initial trial and discovery of the lawsuit have been delayed for many years, and there are various mysteries in the middle.

Bitcoin (BSV) Supporters Famous Wright’s victory on social media platforms and forums.However, other cryptocurrency advocates criticize The publication Coingeek reported the verdict in a biased manner. Coingeek author Jordan Atkins claimed in his book title “Bitcoin creator Craig Wright is 100% Satoshi Nakamoto, Kleiman v. Wright said the jury.”

“Thank you for your support over the years,” Wright Say in the video response After the verdict. “This is an amazing good result, I think it makes perfect sense. “Next, there will be more battles. Everything will change… from cryptocurrency to digital cash, just as it is. My original invention is back. I’m not going anywhere, I’ve been here for a long time, I’m here to fight. “

Bitcoin advocates scoff at Wright’s alleged victory

Some other Bitcoin advocates different opinions result.Alistair Milne Said: “Craig Wright was convicted of stealing the assets of his deceased partner and fined $100 million.” Attorney Stephen Palley Tweet: “Haha. Those who think that being beaten by the jury with a $100 million exchange (theft) verdict is a victory.”

Tags in this story

$100 million, 100000000, All counts, Arthur Van Pelt, Billions, Billy Marcus, Bitcoin, Bitcoin trial, Bitcoin, Carolina Borado, Conversion fee, Craig Wright, David Kleiman, Florida, Ella Kleiman, Jordan Atkins, Juror, jury, Jury trial, Kleman Manor, litigation, Miami, Satoshi Nakamoto, Southern District of Florida, Stephen Pallet, Trial, Wilville Friedman

“Craig Wright is a liar, pretending to be Satoshi Nakamoto without evidence, and being sued by some other person or similar people, I don’t remember,” Dogecoin co-founder Billy Marku S Tweet“Anyway, the whole thing is stupid. My tweet is just making fun of idiots who blame the developers and founders for the current transaction price.”

The lawyer representing Kleiman seemed satisfied with the verdict, when he Tweet “100,000,000” has a smiley emoji. “Craig Wright is now officially the most bankrupt Faketoshi ever,” Twitter account Arthur Van Pelt Said. Is that part of the Guinness World Records? “He went further Ask.

This lawsuit may result in some type of appeal process by both parties to the juror’s recent decision. The hustle and bustle on social media is no different than it has ever been, because Wright’s supporters wholeheartedly believe that this decision is a huge victory, while Wright’s critics believe that the case proves that he did something wrong. Either way, the verdict may not change any strong prejudice that supports or opposes Wright, regardless of whether his Nakamoto story is true or false.

What do you think of the judgment in Kleiman v. Wright? Please tell us your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.

Image Source: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wikimedia Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. It is not a direct offer or invitation to buy or sell, nor is it a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. Bitcoin Network Does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. The company or the author is not directly or indirectly responsible for any damage or loss caused or claimed to be caused by using or relying on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.